Results Summary

          Looking at the results from my survey, I can see how effective the advertisement was and which aspects of it were good/bad. I found that those who viewed the advertisement were no younger than 16 although some were 18 or above. This shows that the results give the opinion of a teenage audience. 11 people had answered the survey and they answered all questions. I created a pie chart to show the ages that viewed the advertisement as it shows a large portion of it being 17 year olds. For the closed questions I used a bar chart as I felt it was the best way to show how many people said yes/no to a question. I found that all of the people that watched the advertisement thought that is was entertaining. 11 people said that they thought it was entertaining, with 0 people saying they did not find it entertaining.

          9 of the 11 people said that they would purchase Polos after watching the advertisement, with 2 people saying that they would not. This may have been due to them not liking the mint Polo in the first place, and the advertisement may have had no effect. I should have asked underneat this question ''if not, then why would you not purchase them?'' so they could clarify. Again, 9 out the 11 people thought that the advertisement was clear which means that they understood it. From this analysis, the two people who would not purchase Polos may not purchase them because they did not understand the advertisement, although it is not sure whether these are the same 2 people.

          10 people thought that the soundtrack throughout the advertisement was suitable, with 1 person saying this it was not. This may have been down to personal preference or them feeling that another track would have suited it better. The acting, though, was said to be satisfactory by all viewers. 11 out of 11 said yes it was satisfactory. For the last quantitative question, I used a bar graph to show the results of how well the viewers thought the advertisement was edited. From the results, I can see that there is an empty space to one side (the lower side of the scale) and several bars on the right (high end of the scale). This shows that all viewers thought highly of the editing within the advertisement, and not one of them thought it was poor.

          For the qualitative questions I gained a better understanding as to what the viewers thought and why they had these thoughts of the advertisement. I found that the viewers enjoyed the advertisement as they thought that ''it was funny and made you wonder what was going to happen at the end''. This shows that we achieved our target of making this advertisement amusing. I also found that people found  the shots and storyline equally as good as each other, which shows that both are complimentary and improve the advertisement. The storyline was said to be ''humorous and engaging'' whilst the shots were ''excellent, a great variety and technically secure''. This helps the advertisement vastly in terms of it being successful.

          Expanding on the fact that the viewers enjoyed the way in which the advertisement was filmed, they also enjoyed the editing throughout. I feel that the editing process was very important and it looks as though, from the results, it was done very well. Viewers thought that the editing was ''fast paced and successfully drew attention'', ''it was interesting'', and ''the shots went well together to create a smooth and rich storyline''. As for the advertisement overall, the some of the viewers feel that some improvements could have been made. Some said that it did not need improving at all, although others said that they are ''not sure all age groups would understand the Marco Polo reference''. Also, another viewer feels that ''a bit of backstory or more of an establishing shot would make it clearer''.

          When asked if the audience would recommend this advertisement to others, they all said that they would. This is an excellent result as a big part in advertising is word of mouth. If these people feel that this advertisement is good and they would recommend it, many other people will watch it. When asked to comment upon the acting within the advertisement, we received positive feedback saying that it was ''done very well'' and the actors were ''very convincing and impressive''. This helped the advertisement as I feel that if this was done badly then it would make the advertisement come across as bad and cringeworthy. All aspects of the advertisement are important and from the feedback I can see that we have created a good advertisement which people enjoyed watching. I am very pleased with the results.

Results #2

Results

Feedback Methods

          After our advertisement was viewed, we aimed to receive feedback from the audience. We used different methods in order to measure how successful our advertisement had been. In this post I will explain which methods we used, how these methods were put into place, and why we used them.

          First of all, we organised a focus group in order to receive feedback from the audience straight after they viewed the advertisement; we decided to ask them questions almost immediately, although giving them time to think about what they just viewed, so that the advertisement was still fresh in their mind. We decided to record the Q&A with the audience so that we could refer back to it when collecting our results. We started at one end asking the first person a question and then went around the room allowing all others to answer this same question.
           We collected a range of different answers which allows us to look at how people like different parts of the advertisement. We asked a diverse audience, making sure that we did not just ask just one group of the same age. This means that our feedback was reliable as it shows what people of different ages think about it; as we aimed the advertisement for a wide audience (young and older audiences) we could tell if it was successful or not by finding out if both audiences enjoyed it.

          As for the questions asked to the audience members, we decided to use two different types of questions so we could record the results in different ways. We used qualitative research as well as quantitative research to collect a range of answers that we could, at a later date, show in different ways; qualitative research was used to gather in-depth understanding of the audiences answers and why they said what they did. We asked questions on what the viewer liked/disliked about the advert and asked them to explain their answer.
          An example of this is the question ''Which did you prefer: the storyline/the shots? Why?''. This allows the viewer to say which aspect they preferred and then state why they think this. Quantitative research was used to gather numerical results to understand how many people shared the same views. An example of when this was used is the question ''How well has the advertisement been edited?''. The way in which the viewer would answer this is on a scale from 1 (poor) to 10 (excellent). Upon collecting data for this, I could add up how many people selected each answer which would then determine how effective the editing was within the advertisement and how well it was put together. 
          We also created a survey online which can be seen on the blog after the advertisement had been posted. This survey is also linked within the description of the advertisement on the website YouTube. This means that anyone from all over the world can see this advertisement and take out the survey. This is a positive aspect as it allows the advertisement to be seen by a wide audience and receives feedback from all backgrounds of life. I will then collect these results via the website the survey is on (SurveyMonkey) and examine them.
          I also used both open and closed questions within my feedback forms to collect a range of answers. I used closed questions (yes/no) to receive feedback that is easy to put into a graph/table. This was also done for the viewer answering the questions as they are easy/quick to fill out. This is more reliable as they aren't likely to lie to complete it faster as they may do if it was a blank box they had to fill out. I did, however, also ask open questions to allow the viewer to think and reflect on the advertisement and give their opinions and feelings within the answer box. This allows me to understand why people think that an aspect may be good/bad and allows them to explain in detail. 
          I feel that I have collected the feedback in the best way and I hope to see that the results are positive and that the audience feel as though the advertisement was successful. I will look at all results collected and then present them using various methods. I will present the video clips taken when asking questions to the audience, and show the feedback in graphs/charts.
          

Polo Advertisement Feedback #2

Create your free online surveys with SurveyMonkey , the world's leading questionnaire tool.

Advertisement Feedback

Create your free online surveys with SurveyMonkey , the world's leading questionnaire tool.

Task Five – Pitch

Sources of Information

          Throughout the pre-production process, we decided to plan our advertisement in many different ways; this was to refine ideas and make sure that our advertisement at the final process would be the best it could be. We created documents such as sketches, storyboards, budgets, health and safety plan, feedback from audiences etc. 

          When we were first thinking up the idea/s of our advertisement, we created a spider diagram to brainstorm all ideas we had. We expanded on all points put down on the spider diagram and we finally had three ideas, one of which would be chosen for our advertisement. We then decided to sketch the three ideas so that we could visualise what the advertisement would look like. This was very useful as it allowed us to rule out any ideas we thought we could not take out in real life or may have been difficult to do. Looking at all three sketches, we weighed up the negatives/positives and finally chose one idea. 

          We then decided to create a storyboard  for the idea we were going to use so that we could visualise the advert for the first time. We brought this document with us when we were filming the advertisement so that we could refer back to it before each shot. This enabled us to stick to the plan and not go off track with the filming. If we did not take this document with us we would have forgot which part come next within the advertisement; as we had it with us we could look which part come next, the duration of the shot, the movement of the character/s, and the shot type. If we were to do this again, I feel we could have used more detail within the storyboard as it was very basic. With that said, it was still very useful to have and helped us film. 

          A shooting schedule was designed so that we could complete sections of the advertisement meeting certain deadlines. It enabled us to organise our time wisely and effectively complete the task. Upon creating the shooting schedule, we realised we would soon run into problems. First of all, we decided that there were several days which we could not film for certain reasons; the first reason was because of the weather. We were filming at a time when the weather was poor and it would rain on some days but we dry the next. We did not want to go to record in the rain as the equipment would become damaged and there would be risks regarding health and safety. Adding to this, the weather may have been good on some days although the cast/crew were unavailable due to plans already arranged. This means that filming was postponed to a later date to which all cast/crew were available to come. 

          We then, as we had our advertisement fully in mind, thought about the props/equipment needed. We did not want to spend too much money so we decided to create a budget. We thought about this document carefully as we did not want to spend over the budget, although we did not want to purchase cheap equipment that would not work either. As we thought about it, we realised we already had most equipment so did not need to spend a lot of money. We had a camera (Nikon p500), tripod, a costume, bow and arrow. We did, however, have to purchase 2 more costumes from an online store which were rather pricey (around £25 each), and a packet of Polos. We stuck to the budget we originally planned and this document was helpful in doing so. 
          We were finally ready to go film, although we decided to visit the location prior to filming to assess health and safety issues. This risk assessment document was helpful as it allowed our cast/crew to stay safe throughout filming. We decided to go when the weather was clear/dry as we were going to film in this same weather. As we could tell from the first look at the setting, there were branches on the floor which could have caused harm to the cast/crew. These branches were easy to move though and we cleared the floor very quickly. We took down other health and safety notes from the setting and we kept them in mind for when we would start filming. When we arrived at the setting on the day of recording, we again cleared the path in which we would record and made sure branches high above were also safe. This task was helpful as it allowed us to know wether we could use this setting or not use it if it was unsafe; if we did not check, we would have wasted a day as we would not have filmed in an unsafe environment. 
          As a group, we decided to create a call sheet to allow all cast/crew know what their role is within the creation of the advertisement. It also allowed all cast/crew to know what equipment they were responsible for and what the arrangement was in regards to meeting up. I feel that this document was useful as all cast/crew remembered what they were in charge of and all equipment/props were present at filming. This document was mainly used, though, to let the cast/crew know when and where they were meant to be on the day of filming. All people turned up on time and we could stick to the schedule and complete the advertisement in time. If people were late, it would mean that we would have to stay out longer and it would become darker; this would be a continuity error within the advertisement. 
          I feel that throughout the pre-production stage, the most useful documents we created were the sketches. I feel this way as they allowed us to visualise the advertisement and it enabled the actors to know what they were doing. If I was to just tell the actors what the advertisement was about, I feel that they would not have acted as well. We were able to refer back to this document throughout the planning/filming of the advertisement and it was very useful. As previously mentioned, I feel that we could have spent more time on these documents including more detail into them so that there were more frames to go by when filming. This would have enabled us to stick directly to a plan without having the improvise. We, also, could have had the dialogue written down so that the actors could have rehearsed the lines. With that said, it was a very useful document and was a big help throughout all parts of the planning/filming. 

          I feel that the least useful document, although still quite useful within planning this advertisement, was the call sheet. I feel this way as we did not really follow this document when going to film. We had it in mind, although some cast/crew did not have any props/equipment to bring where others had to bring a lot. This was due to some cast/crew already owning props/equipment so they brought their own items. We tried to stick to times on this document although it was altered to make sure everyone met up at the same time. I feel though that this document was still helpful, it was just not as important as other documents. I feel that we still would have had all equipment/props and met up at the same time without completing this document as there were only 3 of us. 

          To conclude, if I was to take out this project again I would spend more time on the pre-production process; I would include more detail into the overall documents so that each aspect of the filming was defined more clearly. This would mean no confusion at all, whereas we did have some with certain shots and meeting times. I feel that if I had spent more time on these documents, the overall quality of the advert would be increased as we could constantly refer to the documents which would have been thought about carefully. I am pleased, however, with the advertisement and I strongly feel that these pre-production documents helped throughout the task.